Bebur Liquid Cooling Cleanliness
Liquid cooling / Data centers / Water quality and particles

Liquid Cooling System Cleanliness Testing

The particles, ions and pH drift you cannot see inside a cold plate eventually surface as rising pressure drop, corrosion perforation and throttled nodes. This guide puts pH, conductivity, turbidity and particle counting where each belongs, across component cleaning, system flushing and day-two operation.

Updated 2026-11-11 Basis 15 standards, incl. GB/T 48023-2026 and T/CAEE 098-2026 Read about 14 minutes
Secondary closed loop DI water / EG or PG solution CDU - Coolant Distribution Unit Cold plates Supply Return 01 pH 02 Conductivity 03 Turbidity 04 Particles Side-stream / degassing No pipe cut / no flow change
Secondary loop layout: 01-04 mark the four measurement points. Actual locations follow the CDU, manifold and piping arrangement; see the measurement points section.
pH
8.0–10.0incoming, copper cold plate; aluminium 8.0–9.0
Conductivity
By agreementreported value only; flushing water ≤10 µS/cm
Turbidity
≤5 / ≤20 NTUincoming / operating limit
Particles
50 / 300 µmsecondary / primary filtration; delivery 16/14/11

Values from GB/T 48023-2026 Annex A Table A.1 and Annex B flushing requirements, plus the cleanliness clauses of T/CAEE 098-2026. Operating pH must also stay within ±1 of the incoming baseline. Acceptance is governed by the standard text and the project technical agreement.

The short version

Cold-plate cleanliness testing comes down to four measurements: particle counting establishes the size distribution and cleanliness class, pH and conductivity flag ion load and corrosion risk, and turbidity shows total suspended solids. Each is judged at a different stage, and none substitutes for another.

  1. 01The four parameters answer four different questions: pH and conductivity cover dissolved ions and acid-base balance, turbidity covers total suspended solids, particle counting covers size bands. None can replace another.
  2. 02Criteria are stage-specific: component delivery, system flushing, incoming coolant and operating coolant are four different frames. Mixing them is the most common reason a cleanliness report gets rejected.
  3. 03Online monitoring is about trend, not a single reading. Pair supply and return points to answer whether the system is getting dirtier or the filter is doing its job.

Who it is for: design, integration, commissioning and O&M teams on cold-plate liquid cooling projects; manufacturers of CDUs, cold plates, manifolds, hoses and quick disconnects; quality engineers who sign off cleanliness reports and incoming inspections.

Where contamination comes from: particles, ions and suspended solids

Contamination is not simply a matter of "dirty, so flush it". There are three independent failure paths: particle blockage, ionic corrosion, and deposition of suspended solids and biofilm. Collapsing them into one vague "water quality" number is how sites end up with a turbidity reading that looks fine while the cold plate is clogging.

Particles: size and channel geometry decide the outcome

GB/T 48023-2026 sets two filtration tiers: secondary-side filters should be no coarser than 50 µm, primary-side no coarser than 300 µm, and filters should be serviceable while the system is running. T/CAEE 103-2026 goes further for cold-plate manifolds with countable limits: after internal flushing, particles above 100 µm must not exceed 10 per litre, and particles above 50 µm must not exceed 100 per litre. Both point at the same threshold: above 50 µm you are already in the range that needs control.

Bar lengths are an order-of-magnitude guide, not a linear scale. µm(c) denotes the equivalent particle size under the ISO 4406 calibration convention.

A filter rating is not a cleanliness class

A 50 µm filter removes most particles above 50 µm; actual penetration still depends on efficiency, bypass and element condition. ISO 4406 counts concentration bands above 4, 6 and 14 µm(c). The first is a system design and protection setting, the second an acceptance criterion for components and fluid. They are not interchangeable, and a filter rating cannot be used to back-calculate a cleanliness pass.

Ions: conductivity and pH are a pair, not alternatives

Conductivity reflects total dissolved ions in the coolant; pH reflects acid-base balance. Table A.1 of GB/T 48023-2026 specifies incoming secondary coolant pH 8.0–10.0 for copper cold plates or 8.0–9.0 for aluminium; operating pH within ±1 of the incoming baseline and inside 7.0–10.0 (copper) or 7.0–9.0 (aluminium). For conductivity the standard gives a reported value, to be agreed between supplier and buyer.

That is why "the national standard caps conductivity at some number" is a common misreading. The enforceable limit has to be written into the technical agreement, and the report should state "limit per agreement" rather than a blanket "meets the national standard". Flushing has its own hard figures: conductivity no higher than 10 µS/cm at 25 °C, copper and iron each no higher than 0.5 mg/L.

Low pH costs you metal corrosion and a degraded passive film; high pH costs you inhibitor effectiveness, faster scaling and aged seals. Both appear first in conductivity and in dissolved copper and iron, so read these three as a single trend.

Suspended solids and microbes: turbidity measures quantity, not form

Turbidity is an optical quantity, the scattering and absorption of light by suspended particles, and it is not the same observable as a particle count. The standard sets incoming secondary coolant turbidity at ≤5 NTU and operating at ≤20 NTU, with flushing water ≤5 NTU. The same table carries an indicator that is easy to skip: total colony count, ≤100 CFU/mL incoming and ≤1000 CFU/mL operating. Once biofilm forms inside a cold plate channel it raises both pressure drop and turbidity, and cleaning it costs far more than monitoring it.

Secondary coolant (ethylene glycol or propylene glycol aqueous solution): incoming turbidity ≤5 NTU, operating ≤20 NTU. Conductivity is to be agreed between supplier and buyer. After system flushing the water should meet: conductivity ≤10 µS/cm at 25 °C, pH 5–7.5, turbidity ≤5 NTU, copper ≤0.5 mg/L, iron ≤0.5 mg/L.

GB/T 48023-2026, Data center cold-plate liquid cooling system technical specification, Annex A Table A.1 and Annex B flushing requirements (summary; acceptance per the standard text)

How the four parameters divide the work

Site disputes are rarely about instrument accuracy; they are usually about using the wrong parameter to answer the question. Put all four in one table, define each boundary, then talk about selection.

pHAcid-base balance / inhibitor
8.0–10.0incoming · copper cold plate

Covers acid-base balance and inhibitor effectiveness. In operation the drift from the incoming baseline matters more than the absolute value.

ConductivityDissolved ions
0–2000µS/cm · instrument range

Covers total ion content. The standard only asks for a reported value by agreement, so range selection is a more useful exercise than hunting for a limit.

TurbidityTotal suspended solids
5 / 20NTU · incoming / operating

Covers total suspended solids with no size resolution. It raises an alarm, but cannot carry a cleanliness classification on its own.

ParticlesSize-banded counts
16/14/11ISO 4406 · delivery class

Covers size distribution and cleanliness code; the primary criterion for component acceptance, filter evaluation and failure tracing.

Table 1 Division of work, criteria and measurement points for the four parameters (criteria are standard or agreement values; see "How to cite 15 standards")
ParameterWhat it tells youWhat it cannot seeKey criterion and sourceSuggested pointInstrument
pH Acid-base balance; whether the inhibitor stays in its effective window Particles, total ions, microbes Incoming 8.0–10.0 (copper) / 8.0–9.0 (aluminium); operating within ±1 of the incoming baseline and 7.0–10.0 / 7.0–9.0 (GB/T 48023-2026 Table A.1) CDU secondary supply and return BS-PHS276
Conductivity Total dissolved ions; leading indicator of corrosion and leaching Suspended particles, size distribution, pH Operating: reported value by agreement; flushing water ≤10 µS/cm at 25 °C (GB/T 48023-2026) CDU secondary supply and return; make-up tank BS-EC350
Turbidity Total suspended solids; degree of optical attenuation Size bands, ion concentration, particle composition Incoming ≤5 NTU, operating ≤20 NTU (GB/T 48023-2026 Table A.1); flushing water ≤5 NTU CDU return preferred, supply for reference BS-TURB113
Particles Particle count per size band and cleanliness code Ions, acid-base, microbes, particle composition Delivery ≥ISO 4406 16/14/11 (T/CAEE 098-2026); manifolds per litre (T/CAEE 103-2026); filtration 50 / 300 µm (GB/T 48023-2026) Side-stream sampling; portable spot checks; cleaner loop BT8500 / BTP8300

"Incoming / operating" values are the secondary coolant frame of GB/T 48023-2026 Annex A Table A.1, covering ethylene glycol or propylene glycol aqueous solutions and other formulated fluids. Formulations differ by project, so check the standard text and the agreement before applying them.

Why turbidity cannot replace particle counting

Turbidity is a total. The same 1 NTU can come from a mass of sub-micron particles or from a handful of 100 µm particles; the latter are far more dangerous to a microchannel cold plate, yet may read lower. GB/T 48023-2026 asks CDUs to monitor pH, conductivity and turbidity; it does not mandate an online particle counter. For microchannel cold plates and high-density clusters, add an online liquid particle counter for classification and filter evaluation.

Five stages of liquid cooling cleanliness testing

Cleanliness cannot be secured by one final inspection. Put measurement at five positions, each with its own criteria and instruments, and the data forms a traceable chain.

01

Component cleaning at the factory

Object
Cold plates, manifolds, CDUs, corrugated hoses, quick disconnects
Criteria
Delivery cleanliness no lower than ISO 4406 16/14/11 (T/CAEE 098-2026); manifolds >100 µm ≤10/L and >50 µm ≤100/L (T/CAEE 103-2026); cleaning water pH 6–8, conductivity ≤10 µS/cm (YD/T 6358-2025)
Method
Put a particle counter on a side stream of the cleaner loop and judge the endpoint from the count-decay curve. Integrate pH and conductivity at the same point to see whether the bath's ion load has already saturated.
Instruments
BT8500 (online) or BTP8300 (spot checks) + BS-PHS276 + BS-EC350
Watch
Cleaning time does not replace a counting endpoint. The report must state method, sampling and criterion; "meets 16/14/11" without the decision chain cannot be re-verified.
02

Incoming material and pre-installation

Object
Pre-fabricated piping, manifolds, CDUs, site-delivered components
Criteria
Internal particulate cleanliness before installation ≤50 µm (T/DZJN 524-2026); secondary CDU filter porosity ≤50 µm; initial internal cleanliness ≤50 µm secondary, ≤300 µm primary (T/CIEP 0228-2026)
Method
Spot-check critical parts with a portable counter, and check the supplier's report for method, sampling location and the source of the criterion. A report missing one layer is treated as unverifiable data.
Instruments
BTP8300 portable liquid particle counter
Watch
Transport, damaged packaging and on-site cutting all reintroduce particles. Keep pre-installation records in a separate file from factory reports.
03

System flushing acceptance

Criteria
Circulate deionised water for no less than 24 h; after flushing pH 5–7.5, conductivity ≤10 µS/cm at 25 °C, turbidity ≤5 NTU, copper ≤0.5 mg/L, iron ≤0.5 mg/L (GB/T 48023-2026 Annex B)
Method
Sample and count at fixed intervals and take "no further reduction across consecutive counts" as the endpoint. 24 h is a minimum duration, not a pass certificate; stopping when the clock runs out mistakes a process requirement for an acceptance conclusion.
Instruments
Portable particle counter + online pH / conductivity / turbidity
Watch
Sample in turbulent sections, away from dead legs and low-point drains. If counts plateau while turbidity stays high, check for bubbles and optical window fouling first.
04

Fill and operating monitoring

Criteria
Incoming pH 8.0–10.0 / 8.0–9.0 and turbidity ≤5 NTU; operating pH within ±1 of baseline and 7.0–10.0 / 7.0–9.0, turbidity ≤20 NTU; conductivity per technical agreement (GB/T 48023-2026 Table A.1)
Method
Pair pH, conductivity and turbidity on CDU supply and return; run the particle counter on a side stream. Set two alarm tiers: a warning near the incoming baseline and an alarm at the operating limit, leaving a response window between them.
Instruments
BS-PHS276 / BS-EC350 / BS-TURB113 / BT8500
Watch
The standard says the CDU "should" monitor these three, which makes it a recommended configuration. Whether to add a particle counter depends on channel geometry and project risk, and belongs in the O&M plan.
05

Diagnosis and root-cause tracing

Particle spike
Check filter differential pressure, pump seals and heat exchanger erosion first, then make-up water carryover; a spike after installation or maintenance is usually construction debris.
pH drift
A one-way fall points to inhibitor depletion or microbial activity; a one-way rise to make-up alkalinity and scaling tendency. Sample and retest once drift exceeds ±0.5.
Conductivity up, turbidity flat
Ion leaching or make-up water carryover. Check material compatibility and make-up quality before flushing anything.
Turbidity up, counts flat
Rule out bubbles, optical window fouling and sediment in the sampling line before concluding that suspended solids really increased.
Suggested order of judgement

Start with particles (is it blocking?), then pH and dissolved copper/iron (is it corroding?), then conductivity (where is the ion load heading?), and finally turbidity as a cross-check. Reverse the order and the turbidity total will lead you away from the early size and corrosion signals.

How to cite the 15 liquid cooling standards

In this system, national standards govern the system and the fluid, industry standards govern planning and test methods, and association standards govern component delivery and specialised methods. Mixing the layers is the most common reason a cleanliness report gets rejected: the data is right, but the basis is filed at the wrong level.

Table 2 The 15 standards this method relies on, and how deeply each is cited
LevelStandardTitleHow this page uses itDepth
NationalGB/T 48204-2026Information technology - Liquid cooling components for servers and storage equipmentTechnical baseline for server and storage liquid cooling components; used for component selection and material / interface benchmarkingScope
NationalGB/T 48097-2026General specification for cold-plate liquid cooling cabinets in data centersCabinet-level structure, interface and O&M requirements; the higher-level basis for cabinet delivery and site acceptanceScope
NationalGB/T 48023-2026Data center cold-plate liquid cooling system technical specificationPrimary source of criteria here: secondary coolant pH / conductivity / turbidity, flushing water limits, filter rating, CDU monitoring pointsClause
IndustryYD/T 7463-2026Planning requirements for cold-plate liquid cooling computing centersCapacity, layout and supporting requirements at the planning stage; determines where measurement points and sampling access can sitScope
IndustryYD/T 7105-2026Test methods for cold-plate liquid cooling data centersHow acceptance tests are executed; the field procedure for water quality and particle testingClause
IndustryYD/T 6358-2025Technical requirements for cold-plate liquid cooling data centersCleaning water quality for component delivery: pH 6–8, conductivity ≤10 µS/cm, plus pre- and post-cleaning drift limitsClause
AssociationT/DZJN 524-2026Design requirements for liquid cooling data centersInternal particulate cleanliness ≤50 µm before installation; secondary CDU filter porosity ≤50 µmClause
AssociationT/CIEP 0227-2026Design specification for fully liquid-cooled data center systemsDesign frame for fully liquid-cooled systems; used at concept stage to define the monitoring scopeScope
AssociationT/CAEE 099-2026Piping and components for data center liquid cooling systems - cold plate typeDedicated requirements for cold-plate piping and components; a technical supplement for component acceptanceScope
AssociationT/CAEE 098-2026General technical requirements for piping and components in data center liquid cooling systemsDelivery cleanliness criterion: no lower than ISO 4406 16/14/11; a normative annex gives the flush - sample - count - look-up methodClause
AssociationT/CAEE 103-2026Performance and test specification for manifolds in data center liquid cooling systemsParticle-per-litre limits inside manifolds, used alongside the ISO 4406 code rather than instead of itClause
AssociationT/GDSS 021-2026Technical specification for stainless steel piping in liquid cooling - data centersMaterial, cleanliness and installation requirements for stainless steel piping; drives the starting contamination level before flushingScope
AssociationT/CAEE 112-2026Technical specification for stainless steel corrugated hoses in server liquid cooling systemsRequirements for corrugated hoses; cleanliness control in quick-disconnect and flexible sectionsScope
AssociationT/CIEP 0263-2026Technical specification for data center liquid cooling systemsSystem-level technical requirements; complements the system criteria used on this pageScope
AssociationT/CIEP 0228-2026Installation and manufacturing guide for CDU piping and auxiliary control components in data centersInitial internal cleanliness ≤50 µm on the secondary side, ≤300 µm on the primary sideClause

"Scope" means the standard is cited only for its field of application, to define the object and stage, with no figures extracted. "Clause" means specific figures are cited and traceable to a clause. GB/T 48023-2026 was published on 30 July 2026 and takes effect on 1 February 2027; YD/T 7105-2026 took effect on 1 November 2026. Status of the remaining standards should be checked on the National Standards Information Public Service Platform and the national association standards platform.

Table 3 Three layers of basis in a report: what to write, and which field it belongs in
LayerQuestion it answersWhere it goes in the report
MethodHow was it sampled, flushed and counted, and what was the blank?Test method field: extraction or flushing method, cleaning fluid, filter pore size, sample volume, blank value and rounding rules
LimitWhat is the pass line, and who says so?Basis field: national standard clause, association standard class, or customer technical agreement number - never mixed in one line
VerdictIn which state, and for which batch, is the call being made?Conclusion field: component delivery, post-flushing and operating period get their own columns and their own verdicts

When standards conflict, which one wins

Two sets of limits in one report is normal: a general association standard gives an ISO 4406 class, a dedicated one gives particles per litre; a national standard gives an operating range, a customer agreement gives a tighter internal value. Resolve it in this order: contract or technical agreement first; without one, the dedicated standard before the general one, and the stricter of equals; where the standard is silent (secondary conductivity, for example), fall back to the agreement and label it "reported value". Whichever way it resolves, put one source in the verdict field and the other in the comparison column.

The two most common mis-filings

Quoting the flushing water limits of GB/T 48023-2026 (pH 5–7.5, conductivity ≤10 µS/cm, turbidity ≤5 NTU) as the delivery cleanliness criterion for a single cold plate measures a different object altogether. The reverse error - writing the 16/14/11 class of T/CAEE 098-2026 as an operating water quality requirement - equally exceeds its scope. Component versus system, delivery versus operation: separate columns.

One point is routinely overlooked: GB/T 48023-2026 is a recommended national standard (GB/T) and is not mandatory in itself, but once a tender, purchase contract or technical agreement cites it, it binds that project. Before 1 February 2027 you can use it for technical benchmarking and pre-acceptance, but you should not publicly claim "certified to this national standard". Clause-by-clause notes are in our GB/T 48023-2026 clause review.

Measurement points and integration: placement beats specification

A sensor in the wrong place makes precision irrelevant. Three rules govern the secondary side: representative sampling, serviceable in operation, and no disturbance to the main loop.

Table 4 Locations and sampling methods for five measurement points on the secondary side
PointWhat goes thereLocation and samplingWatch out
Supply mainpH, conductivity, turbidityTurbulent straight run downstream of the CDU outlet; insertion depth per pipe size and datasheetAvoid the pump discharge pulsation zone and the first elbow; pH and conductivity must be temperature-compensated
Return mainpH, conductivity, turbidityUpstream of the CDU inlet, paired with the supply pointOnly the supply-return difference shows load-section contamination and filter effect; a single point shows status only
Side-stream samplingOnline particle counterTapped from the supply main, through a degassing unit and back-pressure valve, returning to the return mainNo pipe cut and no sudden diameter change; keep sample flow stable so bubbles are not counted as particles
Cleaner loopParticle counter, pH, conductivitySide stream of the cleaning tank circulation line, in parallel with the cleaning processConfirm wetted-material compatibility with the cleaning agent; judge the endpoint from the count-decay curve
Make-up / reservoirConductivity, pHDownstream of the make-up inlet, below tank level, avoiding stagnant zonesMake-up water is a common cause of conductivity steps; log readings before and after every top-up

All four instrument families offer RS485 Modbus RTU or 4–20 mA output and can tie into the CDU PLC or the data center BMS. Four rules for integration:

  • Unified timestamps. Water quality and particle data must share one clock, otherwise a correlation such as "pH was drifting while counts spiked" cannot be established.
  • Tiered alarms. A warning near the incoming baseline, an alarm at the operating limit, and a response window between them. With a single threshold the site can only ignore it or shut down.
  • Trend retention. Keep raw curves for at least one full O&M cycle for filter life assessment and post-incident review; daily summaries alone will not reconstruct an event.
  • Serviceable side stream. The particle sampling branch must be removable, cleanable and calibratable while the system runs, otherwise every service visit stops the whole loop.
Two hard constraints on location

Sampling points must sit in a turbulent section, not in the stagnant zone downstream of elbows, valves or tees, and not directly at a low-point drain, where deposited particles are swept out and inflate the reading. Particle sampling lines should avoid sudden diameter changes and horizontal runs that trap air; add a degasser and maintain back pressure where needed.

Instrument selection: range, installation and sampling

Four parameters, four instrument families. Select in this order: range from the fluid and the criterion, then installation and sampling from the piping, and finally communications and maintenance.

Bebur BS-PHS276 pH sensor for liquid cooling, with glass sensing membrane and RS485 output cable

BS-PHS276 pH sensor for liquid cooling

Low-conductivity fluids

Designed for the low ion concentration of deionised water and ethylene or propylene glycol solutions. A low-impedance sensing glass stays stable at low conductivity, PT1000 automatic temperature compensation removes the effect of temperature swings, and internal signal isolation copes with the electrical noise of a data hall.

Measuring range0–14 pH
Accuracy±0.02
ResponseT90 ≤20 s
Temperature0–80 °C
Pressure0–0.6 MPa
Process connection3/4 NPT
Power / output9–36 VDC / RS485
MediaPure water, DI water, PG25, EG25

BS-PHS276 Liquid-Cooled pH Sensor 0-14 pH ±0.02

Bebur BS-EC350 conductivity sensor for liquid cooling, stainless steel probe with 3/4 NPT process connection

BS-EC350 conductivity sensor for liquid cooling

Four ranges

Anti-polarisation and signal isolation reject external interference, and the sensor is compatible with propylene glycol, ethylene glycol and deionised water. Ranges A, B, C and D span deionised water through concentrated glycol solutions; choose by the actual fluid and operating window rather than defaulting to the widest range.

Range A / B0–20 / 0–200 µS/cm
Range C / D0–1000 / 0–2000 µS/cm
Cell constantK=0.01 / 0.1 / 1 / 1
Accuracy±1.5 %FS
ResponseT90 ≤60 s
Temperature0–100 °C, PT1000 compensation
Power / output18–27 VDC / 4–20 mA or RS485
Process connection3/4 NPT, stainless steel wetted parts

BS-EC350 Liquid-Cooled Conductivity Sensor ±1.5%FS

Bebur BS-TURB113 turbidity sensor for liquid cooling, through-beam optical probe

BS-TURB113 turbidity sensor for liquid cooling

Through-beam optics

The emitter sends light at a fixed wavelength and the receiver measures transmission through the coolant; suspended solids scatter and absorb it, and the attenuation maps to turbidity. A through-beam layout with a sapphire window is unaffected by reflections from stainless piping, and the built-in wiper brush limits bubbles and fouling for long-term online use.

Range0–10 NTU / 0–100 NTU
Resolution0.001 NTU
Repeatability≤1 %
Response<30 s (10 s measurement cycle)
Working pressure<6 bar
Ambient0–50 °C
OutputRS485
DimensionsΦ30 × 267 mm

BS-TURB113 Liquid-Cooled Turbidity Sensor 0.001 NTU

Bebur liquid particle counters: BT8200 and BT8500 online models plus the BTP8300 portable unit

Online and portable liquid particle counting

Light extinction · 8 channels

Light-extinction counting: a particle passing the cell blocks a laser, pulse amplitude maps to size and pulse count to number. BT8500 covers long-term side-stream monitoring and production cleaning stations, BT8200 suits multi-point line integration, and the portable BTP8300 handles incoming inspection and flushing acceptance.

Size range1–200 / 2–400 / 2–750 µm
Channels8 standard, 16 / 24 / 32 optional
PrincipleLight extinction
Display7-inch colour touchscreen (BT8500)
OutputRS485 Modbus RTU, 4–20 mA
SamplingContinuous online, optional degassing unit
Portable checksBTP8300, under 1 min per test
StandardsISO 4406 and NAS 1638 class output

See the Liquid Particle Counter in the English catalogue

Three selection rules

  • Size the conductivity range to the fluid. Deionised water uses 0–20 µS/cm (range A); PG25 / EG25 service usually falls in 0–200 or 0–1000 (B / C); wide or concentrated duty uses D. An oversized range wastes resolution where the readings matter.
  • Size the turbidity range to the criterion. A 0–10 NTU range decides the ≤5 NTU incoming limit; 0–100 NTU covers the ≤20 NTU operating limit and the high turbidity of flushing. A model that switches ranges online suits a shared flushing-and-operation instrument.
  • Set particle channels by target size. ISO 4406 needs the >4, >6 and >14 µm(c) bands; for the 50 / 100 µm component limits, confirm the lower range limit, channel setup and calibration can resolve the target size - never let "widest range" stand in for "effective resolution".

These parameters were checked against Bebur product pages on 2026-11-10. Configurations and options can change between batches; confirm against the current datasheet and order agreement before ordering.

Field notes and five common myths

The same instruments, installed differently, vary by an order of magnitude in data credibility. The six points below are where sites most often go wrong, and what is worth confirming first when a method goes live.

Bubbles are the first error source in particle counting

Light extinction cannot tell a bubble from a solid particle. Flushing, pump suction and the moments after a top-up entrain microbubbles and can double or triple the reading. Side-stream sampling needs a degasser and back pressure, and the tap should sit away from pump inlets and downstream of make-up points.

Sampling representativeness decides whether the data is usable

Sample in a turbulent straight run, not in the stagnant zone downstream of elbows, valves or tees, and not straight from a low-point drain. Avoid sudden diameter changes and horizontal runs that trap air, and hold flow at the datasheet design value.

An oversized range makes the low end unreadable

Four conductivity ranges are not a case of bigger being better. On deionised water the 0–20 µS/cm range is what resolves the small changes at the end of flushing; using 0–2000 µS/cm everywhere throws away two decades of effective resolution.

Temperature compensation is not optional

pH and conductivity both move with temperature, and the standard limits themselves are referenced to 25 °C. Use PT1000 automatic compensation for pH and convert conductivity to 25 °C; uncompensated readings cannot be compared across different supply temperatures.

Set the maintenance interval from the fouling rate

The wiper brush limits turbidity fouling, but the optical window still needs periodic inspection. Calibrate the pH probe on a schedule and keep it in 3 mol/L or saturated KCl when idle. Maintenance and calibration records must be filed together, or the data is not traceable.

Criteria cannot be borrowed across stages

Flushing water, component delivery, incoming coolant and operating coolant are four sets of criteria. Put one stage's standard number on another stage's conclusion and the report is rejected even when the data is right. Separate columns, separate standards, separate states: that is the minimum.

Five common myths

  • "Turbidity is normal, so cleanliness passes." Turbidity is a total and cannot resolve size. ISO 4406 counts the 4, 6 and 14 µm(c) bands, and microchannel risk comes mainly from large particles; a low turbidity reading does not prove they are absent.
  • "The national standard sets a conductivity ceiling." GB/T 48023-2026 gives secondary conductivity as a reported value to be agreed between the parties. The enforceable limit comes from the technical agreement, and the report should state "limit per agreement".
  • "A 50 µm filter means no particle exceeds 50 µm." A filter rating describes the element's retention class, not the maximum particle size in the system. Bypass, element failure and start-stop surges all let particles larger than 50 µm reach the cold plate.
  • "Twenty-four hours of flushing is a pass." 24 h is the minimum duration the standard gives; pH, conductivity, turbidity and copper/iron still have to be judged afterwards. Treating the clock as the conclusion mistakes a process requirement for an acceptance criterion.
  • "With online instruments, lab sampling is unnecessary." Online instruments carry trend and alarms; arbitration and disputes still require sampling and retesting by the standard method. They are complementary, not substitutes.

One integration that is already in service

Component cleaning is where all four parameters are easiest to use together: you need to know when the count has reached its endpoint, and whether the bath's ion load has already saturated.

The method is simple: integrate an online particle counter, a pH sensor and a conductivity sensor on a side stream of the cleaning machine's circulation line, without cutting the main pipe or changing the existing flow, and watch the count-decay curve alongside the bath's pH and conductivity. The endpoint is decided from data, not from an operator's stopwatch.

According to Bebur's published technical material, this integration is in service in the liquid cooling component cleaning line at Boyd's Dongguan plant, monitoring solid particles, ionic impurities and pH online and feeding the cleaning result back in real time. The same material notes an improvement in the defect rate after integration.

What the case does not claim

The published material describes the integration and the measurement points; it does not promise any outcome for any project. Actual results depend on the cleaning process, filtration setup, sampling representativeness and operating discipline, and any case figure should be quoted together with its test conditions and statistical basis.

Frequently asked questions

These are the questions that come up most often in selection discussions and site commissioning. Where a clause exists, the answer cites it rather than saying "it depends".

Does a cold-plate liquid cooling system need an online particle counter?

GB/T 48023-2026 asks the CDU to monitor secondary coolant pH, conductivity and turbidity on a “should” basis; it does not mandate an online particle counter. A turbidity meter alone meets that basic recommendation, but turbidity is a total and cannot resolve the 4 / 6 / 14 µm bands. For microchannel cold plates, add an online particle counter for cleanliness classification and filter evaluation.

Is GB/T 48023-2026 mandatory, and when does it take effect?

It is a recommended national standard (GB/T), published on 30 July 2026 and effective from 1 February 2027. A recommended standard is not mandatory in itself, but once a tender, purchase contract or technical agreement cites it, it binds that project. Until then you can use the text for benchmarking and pre-acceptance, but do not claim “certified to this national standard” before 1 February 2027.

What is the acceptance limit for secondary-side conductivity?

Table A.1 gives conductivity as a reported value to be agreed between supplier and buyer; there is no single national ceiling. Write the limit into the technical agreement and label the report “limit per agreement” rather than “meets the national standard”. Flushing has a separate, explicit requirement: no more than 10 µS/cm at 25 °C.

How are the incoming and operating pH criteria applied?

Per Table A.1: incoming pH 8.0–10.0 for copper cold plates or 8.0–9.0 for aluminium; operating pH within ±1 of the incoming baseline and inside 7.0–10.0 (copper) or 7.0–9.0 (aluminium). Operating acceptance needs both conditions at once: drift within 1 of the baseline and an absolute value inside the window. Checking only the absolute value misses slow drift.

Can a turbidity meter replace a particle counter for cleanliness decisions?

No. Turbidity is optical attenuation of the total suspended solids, while ISO 4406 requires counts in three bands - above 4, above 6 and above 14 µm(c) - reported as a three-digit code. The same 1 NTU can come from many small particles or a few large ones, and the risk to a microchannel cold plate differs sharply. They are complementary: turbidity for trend and alarms, particle counting for classification and acceptance.

If flushing water passes, is the component's cleanliness acceptable?

No. The flushing water limits in GB/T 48023-2026 (pH 5–7.5, conductivity ≤10 µS/cm, turbidity ≤5 NTU, copper and iron ≤0.5 mg/L) describe the fluid state after system flushing. Component delivery cleanliness should cite the ISO 4406 16/14/11 class of T/CAEE 098-2026, and manifolds the particles-per-litre limits of T/CAEE 103-2026. Different objects, different criteria, and never the same verdict field.

Why does liquid particle counting need a degassing unit?

Light-extinction counting relies on particles blocking a laser, and bubbles behave optically much like solids, so they are counted and inflate the result. Flushing, pump suction and post-top-up conditions entrain microbubbles. Degassing, back pressure and avoiding sampling at pump inlets are the prerequisites for usable data.

Should water-quality sensors go on the supply or return line?

Ideally both, as a pair. The supply point shows the coolant entering the cold plates, the return point shows what changed across the load, and only the difference answers whether the system is getting dirtier or the filter is working. A single point shows status but cannot separate sources or evaluate filtration. If only one point is possible, use the return main and note the limitation in the report.

Criteria first, then points, then instruments

Cleanliness programmes are often run in reverse: buy the instrument, find somewhere to mount it, then open the standard. The right order is to fix the basis and the stage first, then decide points and sampling; the instrument only executes. Get the criterion wrong and greater accuracy makes the report less credible, not more.

If you are configuring water quality and particle monitoring for a cold-plate project, check the range against the fluid and the criterion, confirm sampling and installation conditions, then look at communications and maintenance. Full specifications and measuring principles for the four instruments are in the links below.

Related reading

About this article

Bebur Liquid Cooling Application Engineering Team

We design liquid particle counting and online water quality applications for liquid cooling, pharmaceutical and semiconductor clients. Every standard clause cited here carries its source; wherever a statement is engineering guidance rather than a standard requirement, it is marked as such.

Instrument parameters were checked against product pages on 2026-11-10. This article is not a compliance certificate or a performance commitment; project decisions rest on the standard text and the contract technical agreement.

If you find a clause citation or parameter that does not match the source, tell us through the Bebur website and we will verify and correct it.

2026-11-11  First published  ·  

References

  1. GB/T 48023-2026, Data center cold-plate liquid cooling system technical specification. Published 2026-07-30, effective 2027-02-01. openstd.samr.gov.cn
  2. Industrial and Information Technology Standard Information Service Platform. std.miit.gov.cn
  3. National Group Standard Information Platform. ttbz.org.cn
  4. National Standard Information Public Service Platform. std.samr.gov.cn